viernes, 27 de marzo de 2009

Google Plans to Lay Off 200 Workers


Google HQ
Erin Siegal/Reuters
Google headquarters in Mountain View, Calif.

Google said Thursday that it would cut about 200 employees from its sales and marketing organization, the third and most significant round of layoffs at the company this year.

Google, which announced the layoffs in a blog post, said that the cuts would reduce overlap between different groups and speed up decision making.

Omid Kordestani, Google’s senior vice president for global sales and business development, said the cuts were meant to address mistakes the company had made during its phase of rapid growth. “In some areas we’ve created overlapping organizations which not only duplicate effort but also complicate the decision-making process,” Mr. Kordestani wrote on Google’s corporate blog. “That makes our teams less effective and efficient than they should be. In addition, we over-invested in some areas in preparation for the growth trends we were experiencing at the time.”

The cuts suggest that the deepening global recession is affecting some parts of Google’s business more severely than the company anticipated just two months ago. In January, after Google laid off 100 recruiters, Eric Schmidt, the company’s chief executive, said that deeper cut were unlikely. In February, the company cut another 40 positions when it closed its radio advertising efforts.

About 100 of the eliminated positions will be in the United States and the rest overseas, said Matt Furman, a Google spokesman. Mr. Furman said the company continued to hire new workers, albeit at a slow rate. In the fourth quarter of 2008, the company grew by 99 workers, ending the year with 20,222 full-time employees. In previous years, Google had added more than 2,000 people in a single quarter.

Laid-off workers will be given time to apply for other jobs within the company.

The layoffs this year are neither the first nor the largest in Google’s history. Last April, Google cut about 300 positions over the American operations of DoubleClick, which it acquired earlier in 2008.


fuente: http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/03/26/google-plans-to-lay-off-200-workers/

domingo, 22 de marzo de 2009

Palm Posts a Loss for a 7th Quarter

Palm reported a wider third-quarter loss that fell short of analysts’ estimates.

The net loss expanded to $95 million, or 89 cents a share, from $54.7 million, or 53 cents, a year earlier, Palm said in a statement on Thursday. Excluding costs for stock-based compensation and other items, the loss of 86 cents a share missed the average 57-cent estimate of analysts surveyed by Bloomberg.

Sales in the period ended Feb. 28 fell 71 percent, to $90.6 million, from $312 million.

Palm is preparing to release its new Pre smartphone in June and hopes the model will revive plummeting sales by winning over fans of the Apple iPhone and BlackBerry, made by Research in Motion.

Palm has reported losses in the last seven quarters. The company, which introduced the pioneering Pilot device more than a decade ago, said on March 3 that sales declined because of dwindling orders for its older models. fuente: http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/20/technology/companies/20palm.html?_r=1&ref=technology

SpiralFrog owes $34 million. Investors get nothing?

Attorneys representing defunct music service SpiralFrog have notified investors not to expect any returns. Whatever money comes from liquidating assets will go to a group that loaned the company an "amount exceeding $34 million."

In a letter dated March 17, 2009, the law firm Rattet, Pasternak & Gordon-Oliver delivered that message to an undisclosed number of SpiralFrog investors. A copy of the letter, seen by CNET News, says that the group that loaned the money was issued senior secured notes, which gives members of the group priority in any funds generated from the sale of assets.

"In that SpiralFrog's creditors will not be paid in full, there will be no distribution to shareholders," the law firm wrote.

The sum of money only includes the loans the company took to continue funding operations and doesn't include the amount that investors put in. Just where all this money went could shed light on some of the travails faced by ad-supported music services. A source close to the company told CNET on Friday that customers will see their music become inaccessible in two months.

New York-based SpiralFrog ceased operations in recent days and is one of the best-known digital music service to fail. The ad-supported service was wracked with problems even before launching in September 2007.


fuente: http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10201735-93.html?tag=newsEditorsPicksArea.0

domingo, 8 de marzo de 2009

Did Apple OK price cut on latest MacBook Air?


No, this isn't a price cut reflected on the Apple Web site. And it's not much. But if you're in the market for a high-end MacBook, every dollar counts. Besides, Apple will probably match the lower price.


At major resellers like Newegg, PC Connection (i.e., Mac Connection), and Buy.com the latest version of the high-end MacBook Air (1.86GHz, 128GB solid-state drive) is now selling for--hold your breath--$2,399 instead of the listed $2,499 on the Apple Web site. Not much. What is best described as a price snip rather than a price cut.

Listing for Apple MacBook Air (1.86GHz, 128GB SSD) on newegg.com(Credit: newegg.com)
But my question is, did Apple green-light this? Or is this simply resellers adjusting their pricing to market realities. (I would imagine that luxury laptops like the MacBook Air are not jumping off the shelves at resellers these days, considering the state of the economy.)
Whether Apple green-lighted it or not may be immaterial, however, because (some? most? all?) Apple stores have a policy that stipulates: if you find an Apple computer priced lower at a major reseller (like Mac Connection), they will price-match it up to 10 percent of the listed Apple price. (This is the policy at the Apple Store that I frequent.)
Maybe there's a trend here. Maybe Apple will even make an official price move. Makes sense, right? The economy is in a tailspin and consumers have less disposable income, so Apple caves and officially cuts prices before the scheduled introduction of new MBA models. But then again, this is Apple. It doesn't have to stoop to unscheduled price cuts--so much for that fond hope.

sábado, 28 de febrero de 2009

Yahoo's Microsoft tab totaled $79 million

Yahoo's tab in its efforts to fight off Microsoft last year ran $79 million, according to the company's filing Friday with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Yahoo spent much of that bill on outside advisers who helped it weigh Microsoft's proposals, which ranged from a total buyout bid for $33 a share to an eventual offer to acquire only Yahoo's search business. Yahoo rejected all of Microsoft's proposals.

Part of the $79 million bill was also attributed to hiring outside advisers for fighting off a proxy contest by activist shareholder Carl Icahn, who eventually settled with the company and received three seats on Yahoo's board.

A portion of the bill also went to Yahoo's outside advisers considering its controversial search agreement with Google, which ultimately ended with the companies walking away from the deal when federal antitrust regulators said it would challenge the deal.

For Yahoo, however, the true cost was much greater than just $79 million.

In the process, Yahoo founder and CEO Jerry Yang stepped down after enduring the brunt of shareholder anger and has since resumed his role as chief Yahoo. Sue Decker, who was Yahoo's president during the tumultuous year, lost out her bid to become the next CEO when Yahoo's board named former Autodesk chief Carol Bartz to oversee the troubled Internet company. And Yahoo saw an exodus of executives in June 2008.

FUENTE: http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10184454-93.html?tag=newsEditorsPicksArea.0

lunes, 23 de febrero de 2009

Online layoff tracker captures economy's carnage

SAN FRANCISCO - In a sour economy like this, entrepreneurs inevitably dream up new ways to turn lemons into lemonade.

At least that's the motive behind a free software program called Layoff Tracker.

Layoff Tracker can be planted on a Web site or a computer desktop to provide a running tally of the pink slips being handed out by major employers around the country. The tracker complies the numbers from news reports and company announcements.

After two weeks of testing, the application — packaged in a capsule format known as a "widget" — was being formally released Monday.

The program is designed to make it easier to monitor the massive payroll purge that has been worsening the 14-month-old recession. And it should trigger more online conversations that help the unemployed get back on their feet, said Bari Abdul, the Layoff Tracker's mastermind.

In the process, Abdul also hopes to generate more traffic and commentary on Telonu.com, a Web site that he launched two months ago to "rave, rant and rate" about employers.

"We live in a world where you can read 15 reviews before you go spend $50 in a restaurant, so it seems like you should also be able to read about places where you might go to work 40 hours each week," he said.

A Web site called Glassdoor.com also provides insights about employers, although it focuses primarily on data about wages and opinions about chief executives.

Abdul reasons that the way layoffs are handled can say a lot about an employer, so Abdul is hoping Teluno's new program encourages more people to write about their firings on the Web site.

"It's a reflection of the times," said Abdul, who has had to dump workers in previous management at McAfee Inc. and Procter & Gamble Inc. "There is a huge healing process that goes on when people realize that all these layoffs aren't really about them, but more about what went wrong at business."

FUENTE: http://tech.yahoo.com/news/ap/20090223/ap_on_hi_te/tec_techbit_layoff_tracker

lunes, 16 de febrero de 2009

Mobile banking: Safe, at least for now

Someone asked me recently whether I thought mobile banking was safe or not. I admitted that I don't do it but that doesn't really say much. Then I mumbled something incoherent and vowed to get a real answer.

After talking to a number of mobile and security experts, I've come to the conclusion that far from being less secure, mobile banking may even be more secure than logging on to your bank Web site over your PC. And the consensus is that it's probably less risky than using checks, which can be forged, and credit cards, which can be stolen or skimmed at ATM machines for clones to be made.

As Bruce Schneier, chief security technology officer at BT, summed it up: "Yes, there are going to be security issues and they will have to shake out. The question is, if something happens will the bank make it up to you?"

Apparently it will. The rules regarding liability in mobile banking are the same as they are for other methods of banking, said Jim Van Dyke, president of Javelin Strategy & Research.

"Credit card companies have zero liability policies that apply regardless of channel," he said. For instance, "Wells Fargo has a written guarantee that they will cover all your losses if it is through mobile banking."

That's good news for the brave few who have ventured into the market. Of all U.S. Internet users, 6 percent have done mobile banking in the last week, and 12 percent have done it in the last month, according to Javelin figures.

An estimated 30 million consumers in the U.S. do mobile banking, and half of all consumers think it's not secure, the research firm said in a mobile banking security standards report in December.

Despite the fact that online banking options abound in the U.S.--from AT&T, Nokia, Sprint Nextel, Visa, and the major banks--consumers have been reluctant. That could be for several reasons, my colleague Marguerite Reardon has concluded: they don't like downloading apps to their phones as is required by some banks, they are turned off by the small screen, and they can do it on their PCs more easily.

"We're not hearing of security issues in the mobile world," because the security benefits with mobile banking outweigh the disadvantages, Van Dyke said.

First, the con to mobile banking security:

Mobile devices are easy to lose: "It's more or less as safe as banking you would do from your home computer, maybe slightly more risky, similar to using a laptop at Starbucks," said Charlie Miller, a principal analyst at consultancy Independent Security Evaluators. "The biggest difference is you are carrying the thing around with you and are more likely to lose physical custody of it than a computer."

Even so, the convenience outweighs the risk, he said. "It is no riskier than calling someone using your debit card or buying on Amazon with a debit card."

Now for the pros:

Mobile banking can be done anywhere at any time: Because people can do mobile banking at any time, they are more likely to log on more frequently and thus the chances of them detecting fraud are increased, said Van Dyke.

Mobile has a diversity of platforms: In the mobile world in the U.S., there is no one dominant mobile platform that can be targeted by malicious hackers like there is with Windows in the PC market. The lack of standardization also reduces the chances that malware will be interoperable with a broad range of mobile software and get widely distributed, Van Dyke said.

No banking-related mobile viruses or malware yet: "In the mobile era, we're not seeing any such Trojans," said Roel Schouwenberg, a senior antivirus researcher for security firm Kaspersky, which has partnered with Barclays in the U.K. to offer security software to mobile customers.

Mobile banking functions are limited at this time: In general, U.S. consumers can check their account balances, transfer funds between their accounts, and see recent transactions over their mobile devices.

"You're getting information that is not transactional," said Nick Holland, a senior analyst at consultancy Aite Group. "In most instances, if someone found your phone and logged into your mobile banking account, the worst they could do is pay your electricity bill."

However, things will change as more transaction functions are enabled on mobile devices, the experts said. For instance, point-to-point transactions and cross-border money transfers are on the horizon, according to Holland.

"There will be more risk as payments move over to mobile devices because criminals will put more focus there and you will get spoofing attempts," said Van Dyke.

The ability to use your cell phone to buy things will undoubtedly put a dent in the credit card business, but it will also give mobile carriers additional revenue to make up for voice business they are losing to things like Skype and text messaging, said Jan Volzke, head of global marketing for McAfee Mobile.

"There is no reason people have to pull out a plastic card with a magnetic strip, technology developed 30 years ago, to buy a latte," he said. "Just hold the phone next to a cashier, it goes beep and there you go."

Other countries are already offering mobile transactions. For example, NTT Docomo in Japan, which uses McAfee security software to monitor for malicious activity on its mobile phones, initially started allowing consumers to use their phones to pay for public transport, and then added payments for things like ice cream and eventually banking, according to Volzke.

In the U.S., banks are more cautious. Payments and banking are the biggest security concern for mobile device manufacturers, according to a Mobile Security Report McAfee is set to release on Monday.

At the same time, the manufacturers aren't installing additional security protection on the vast majority of the devices and won't allow consumers to install security software like they can with computers, said Volzke.

To safeguard against security risks, mobile users should use their device PIN codes, download mobile apps only from their financial institution, switch Bluetooth off when not in use, and avoid lending their phone to strangers to minimize the chance of someone downloading a malicious app onto the device.

All in all, "mobile banking is secure and there's not really any cause for concern," said Holland of Aite Group.


FUENTE: http://news.cnet.com/8301-1009_3-10164244-83.html?tag=newsLeadStoriesArea.1